People Ex Rel. Bowman v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that unusual facts established by the accused require closer scrutiny by the court
• stating that unusual facts established by the accused require closer scrutiny by the court
• demanding state forfeited extradition right by declining other opportunities during previous thirteen years
• demanding state forfeited extradition right by declining other opportunities during previous thirteen years
• demanding State’s dilatory tactics resulted in an unexplained thirteen-year delay
• “The ends of justice will not be served by enforcing extradition for the crime involved on a person who has lived openly within this State for the last eighteen years, and who has been imprisoned on three occasions during the pendency of the extradition proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).