Skip to main content
· 7/13/1891

People ex rel. Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Fairfield

Citations

  • 90 Cal. 186
  • 27 P. 199
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating with direction to remand to the trial court for clarification “[g]iven the uncertainty in the trial court’s order [regarding the defendant’s motion to suppress]”
  • vacating and remanding grant of motion to suppress “for further clarification on the specific findings that form the basis for [the trial court’s] legal conclusions”
  • vacating an order granting a motion to suppress and remanding to the trial court \for further clarification on the specific findings that form the basis for its legal conclusions\
  • vacating an order granting a motion to suppress and remanding to the trial court “for further clarification on the specific findings that form the basis for its legal conclusions”
  • vacating this Court’s decision reversing grant of motion to suppress and remanding to the trial court “for further clarification on the specific findings that form the basis for its legal conclusions” including whether it credited the officer’s testimony
  • “If the trial court has made express findings of fact, but not with sufficient detail to permit meaningful appellate review, an appellate court may remand for further findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.