People ex rel. Bentley v. Commissioners of Highways of Hndson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to require expert testimony in a 19 case involving an officer’s use of force in taking someone to the ground and using a taser
• “[R]equiring expert testimony rather than 20 simply permitting it represents an extraordinary step, one to be taken only when ‘unusually 21 complex or esoteric issues are before the jury.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).