People ex rel. Anderson v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “an action brought pursuant to Executive Law § 296 is not a tort claim which falls within the notice provisions of the General Municipal Law”
• “While the plaintiff correctly argues that an action brought pursuant to Executive Law § 296 is not a tort claim which falls within the notice provisions of the General Municipal Law, nevertheless, his action must be dismissed [pursuant to Town Law § 67].” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).