Peopl v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “if a party timely files a motion to alter or amend a judgment under Rule 9023 . . . or for relief under Rule 9024 . . . , then the time to file a notice of appeal is tolled until the bankruptcy court enters an order resolving the motion”
• “[t]he standard of review for the denial of a motion to reconsider is abuse of discretion”
• “[t]he standard of review for the denial of a motion to reconsider is abuse of discretion”
• “[A]n appeal from a judgment or order not made within fourteen days after entry of that judgment or order may not be considered; this time limit is jurisdictional.”
• “Because Davidson’s first motion for reconsideration — whether properly considered under Rule 9023 or 9024 — was not filed within fourteen days of the order denying his proof of claim, his time to appeal the denial of his proof of claim was not tolled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).