Pentax Corp. v. Robison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “this court will not address issues raised for the first time on appeal or issues not pre- sented on appeal”
• iquoting Lowa, Ltd. v. United States, 5 CIT 81, 83, 561 F.Supp. 441, 443 (1983), aff'd, 724 F.2d 121 (Fed.Cir.1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. The Limited, Inc. Tarrant Apparel Group
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-09-14· cited 75×
• Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research & Engineering Company v. The Lubrizol Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1998-04-28· cited 73×
• Israel Bio-Engineering Project v. Amgen Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-01-29· cited 64×
• Seal-Flex, Inc. v. Athletic Track and Court Construction, and Owen E. Perry, Sanctioned Party-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1999-04-01· cited 62×
• Arcelormittal v. Ak Steel Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2017-05-16· cited 15×
• Tianjin Magnesium Intern. Co., Ltd. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2008-01-08· cited 12×
• Kisor v. Shulkin
  Federal Circuit· 2018-01-31· cited 5×
• Bridalane Fashions, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1998-11-23· cited 3×
• Bags on Net Corp. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2009-03-31· cited 1×
• Brother International Corp. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2003-12-03· cited 1×
• Pentax Corporation v. Robison
  Federal Circuit· 1998-01-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Frank P. Bongiorno
  First Circuit· 1997-04-10· cited 23×
• Pentax Corp. v. Robison
  Federal Circuit· 1997-09-17· cited 19×
• Kathy Wells v. Bobby Glen Rushing and Town of Maben, Mississippi
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-05-20· cited 11×