· 5/3/1999

Pentagen Technologies International Limited v. United States

Citations

175 F.3d 1003
50 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1634
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8491
1999 WL 270390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that courts should interpret pro se complaints “liberally” and “excuse errors” reflecting the “pro se litigants’ unfamiliarity with legal requirements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Friedman, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.