· 11/5/1984
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Center City Motors, Inc.
Citations
- 609 F. Supp. 409
- 6 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2058
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22228
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Congress “clearly intended to prevent a business from limiting its responsibilities under ERISA by the fractionalization of its business operations.”
- interpretations given to \trade or business\ in IRC not determinative of how those terms are interpreted under ERISA
- interpretations given to “trade or business” in IRC not determinative of how those terms are interpreted under ERISA
- same persons made decisions for both entities, so both entities liable
- “[T]he court finds that Congress did not intend to exclude from its definition of a ‘trade or business’ in § 1301, a rental proprietorship which leases property, under a net lease, to an entity that is under common control.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irving
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.