Skip to main content
· 11/5/1984

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Center City Motors, Inc.

Citations

  • 609 F. Supp. 409
  • 6 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2058
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Congress “clearly intended to prevent a business from limiting its responsibilities under ERISA by the fractionalization of its business operations.”
  • interpretations given to \trade or business\ in IRC not determinative of how those terms are interpreted under ERISA
  • interpretations given to “trade or business” in IRC not determinative of how those terms are interpreted under ERISA
  • same persons made decisions for both entities, so both entities liable
  • “[T]he court finds that Congress did not intend to exclude from its definition of a ‘trade or business’ in § 1301, a rental proprietorship which leases property, under a net lease, to an entity that is under common control.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Irving

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.