PENSACOLA BEACH PIER, INC. v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellant failed to preserve an issue for review when the trial court’s error appeared for the first time on the face of the order on appeal and appellants choose not to file a motion for rehearing
• holding, where “Appellants did not file a motion for rehearing asking the court to make a finding regarding [certain] statements,” they failed to preserve the argument
• holding appellants failed to preserve otherwise meritorious argument where error first appeared on face of final summary judgment and appellants failed to move for rehearing, to vacate, or for relief from judgment
• finding that appellants failed to preserve argument for appeal where the “trial court’s error appeared for the first time on the face of the final summary judgment” and appellants did not attempt to correct error in the trial court
• finding argument not raised in response to motion for summary judgment or in motion for rehearing was not preserved for appeal
• finding appellants failed to preserve argument for appeal where “trial court's error appeared for the first time on the face of the final summary judgment” and appellants did not attempt to correct error with trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).