Skip to main content
· 6/29/1995

Federal Case

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 908
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that when there is no event triggering the payment of severance benefits, it is ordinarily unnecessary to dispose of repudiation and damages issue's in connection with severance pay
  • “If anything, such a longstanding policy [to consistently deny the same type of claim] demonstrates a conscious decision to promote uniform treatment of the same type of claim.”
  • “To establish a claim against an insolvent bank in receivership, the liability of the bank must have accrued and become unconditionally fixed on or before the time it is déclared insolvent.”
  • “[b]ecause of our decision” that the plaintiffs’ “claims cannot survive summary judgment, we need not address the propriety of the district court’s [ruling on] class certification”
  • finding severance payments not compensable because analogous to liquidated damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.