· 6/29/1995
Federal Case
Citations
- 58 F.3d 908
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16018
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that when there is no event triggering the payment of severance benefits, it is ordinarily unnecessary to dispose of repudiation and damages issue's in connection with severance pay
- “If anything, such a longstanding policy [to consistently deny the same type of claim] demonstrates a conscious decision to promote uniform treatment of the same type of claim.”
- “To establish a claim against an insolvent bank in receivership, the liability of the bank must have accrued and become unconditionally fixed on or before the time it is déclared insolvent.”
- “[b]ecause of our decision” that the plaintiffs’ “claims cannot survive summary judgment, we need not address the propriety of the district court’s [ruling on] class certification”
- finding severance payments not compensable because analogous to liquidated damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.