Skip to main content
· 3/17/1999

Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23952n Ronald O. Spitz v. Arthur H. Tepfer

Citations

  • 171 F.3d 443
  • 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1326
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • enforcing a comparable local rule to the Eastern District of Wisconsin’s Rule 6.05
  • “Moreover, the tenor of the summary judg- ment opinion reflects the trial court’s intent to dispose of all the issues in the lawsuit . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Manion, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.