Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23945s Kimberly J. Crocco v. Xerox Corporation and Patricia M. Nazemetz, and American Psychmanagement, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• precluding a finding that an employer may be liable as a de facto plan administrator in the presence of a different named administrator
• noting Awe have not yet had occasion to rule on@ the 4 issue
• “[I]f a plan specifically designates a plan administrator, then that individual or entity is the plan administrator for purposes of ERISA.”
• “Employer liability under § 1132(a)(1)(B) is precluded when the employer has named another entity as the plan administrator in the plan document”
• the “central inquiry is whether or not [the plan fiduciary] fully and fairly reviewed [the plan administrator’s] denial of Croceo’s claim for benefits”
• the administrator named by the plan is the administrator for ERISA purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).