Skip to main content
· 11/18/2014

PENROSE v. McCULLOUGH

Citations

  • 308 Mich. App. 145
  • 862 N.W.2d 674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, if the easement in question relates in some way to a particular parcel of property, then it will nearly always be deemed appurtenant
  • “[B]ecause deeds are contracts, the interpretation of their language is an issue of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boonstra, üonofrio, Gleicher, Donofrio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.