Penrod v. Zavaras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prisoner does not have a protected liberty interest in his prison job
• holding that a prisoner does not have a protected liberty interest in his prison job
• holding that a prisoner does not have a protected liberty interest in his prison job
• holding that a 69-day denial of toothpaste may constitute a constitutional deprivation if plaintiff had to be treated by a dentist for bleeding and receding gums and tooth decay
• holding that a 69-day denial of toothpaste may constitute a constitutional deprivation if plaintiff had to be treated by a dentist for bleeding and receding gums and tooth decay
• holding that a 69-day denial of toothpaste may constitute a constitutional deprivation if plaintiff had to be treated by a dentist for bleeding and receding gums and tooth decay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).