Skip to main content
· 1/19/1999

PENOBSCOT NATION, Appellant, v. Cynthia A. FELLENCER, Appellee

Citations

  • 164 F.3d 706
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 642
  • 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,736
  • 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1547
  • 1999 WL 11516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Nation’s decision to terminate Fellencer’s employment was an “internal tribal matter” within the meaning of section 6206(1
  • treating Indian common law as but one factor in determining whether something is an “internal tribal matter”
  • treating Indian common law as but one factor in determining whether something is an \internal tribal matter\
  • rejecting employment discrimination claim against the Penobscot Nation, relying, inter alia, on \`the longstanding federal policy of providing a unique legal status to the Indians in matters of tribal employment'\
  • rejecting employment discrimination claim against the Penobscot Nation, relying, inter alia, on “ ‘the longstanding federal policy of providing a unique legal status to the Indians in matters of tribal employment’”
  • “we recognize! ] that Congress ‘explicitly made existing general federal Indian law applicable to the Penobscot Nation in the Settlement Act.’ That body of law includes [the] Congressional enactment ] excluding Indian tribes from Title VII coverage ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Coffin, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.