Skip to main content
· 3/30/1885

Penny's Appeal

Citations

  • 109 Pa. 323
  • 1885 Pa. LEXIS 526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an expert witness may not testify as to issues of law, which are for a court to decide
  • reasoning that the legislature did not intend “for certain retirees to receive a large windfall simply because their [employer chose] to pay them a lump-sum for unused vacation time in lieu of requiring them to take their vacation time prior to their official retirement date”
  • payment for unused vacation time made to retiring officer should not be considered part of the officer's annual pay for purposes of computing pension benefits
  • payment for unused vacation time made to retiring officer should not be considered part of the officer's annual pay for purposes of computing pension benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Gordon, Green, Mercur, Paxson, Sterrett, Trunkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.