Penny Schneithorst v. James Schneithorst, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the motion court erred in considering third-party gifts as a part of father’s income where there was no evidence that the largesse was ever given directly to the father or that he could control how the funds were spent
• the motion court erred in finding that five monthly payments of $2500 received by a party constituted gift income received with sufficient regularity to use in calculating child support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).