Penny Grable v. Carolyn W. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an ALJ may rely on a vocational expert’s testimony if at least some of the identified jobs are consistent with the claimant’s RFC
• reasoning that one mistaken recommendation does not devalue the remainder of the VE’s opinion
• finding that collection of unemployment benefits undermines the credibility of claimant
• finding that collection of unemployment benefits undermines the credibility of claimant
• finding “one mistaken recommendation” will not devalue the rest of a VE’s opinion “as long as some of the identified jobs satisfy the claimant’s [RFC]”
• affirming the ALJ where one of the jobs had a discrepancy with the DOT, but the remaining job existed in significant numbers in the national economy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).