Pennsylvania v. Champney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “it doesn’t take much expertise to interpret a basic automobile insurance policy”
• performing de novo review in a case involving “cross-motions for summary judgment with no disputed facts”
• applying Illinois law and recognizing that commercial general liability policies are relatively difficult to understand
• performing de novo review in a case involving “cross-motions for summary judgment with no disputed facts”
• “The use of the words ‘shall’ or ‘must’ is generally regarded as mandatory.”
• “Where facts are not disputed, if a district court grants one party’s motion for summary judgment and denies the other party’s cross- motion, this court can reverse and award summary judg- ment to the losing party below.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).