Pennsylvania v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Attorney General’s failure to reclassify marijuana did not violate defendant’s equal protection or due process rights
• “The appellants’ use of components shipped in interstate commerce to make vitamin K for injection brought their activities within § 331(k)....”
• drugs not manufactured in conformity with GMPs are adulterated; United States v. Western Serum Co., Inc., 498 F.Supp. 863, 867 (D.Ariz.1980), aff'd, 666 F.2d 335 (9th Cir.1982) (“[t]he Act is concerned with the manner in which a drug is produced as well as its composition and content”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).