Skip to main content
· 7/19/2011

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Murphy

Citations

  • 25 A.3d 1294
  • 2011 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 334
  • 2011 WL 2802849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying Turnpike Commission’s application to supplement record as seeking proverbial second bite of the apple
  • affirming OOR denial of appeal including that questions do not trigger a response under the RTKL
  • denying supplementation of record on an appeal as an attempt to obtain “a proverbial second bite of the apple” where there was no apparent reason for the failure to submit the additional affidavits to OOR
  • denying supplementation of record on an appeal as an attempt to obtain “a proverbial second bite of the apple” where there was no apparent reason for the failure to submit the additional affidavits to OOR

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simpson, McCullough, Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.