Pennsylvania Railroad v. Connell
Citations
- 112 Ill. 295
Syllabus
<p>1. Carriers op passengers — through coupon tickets over distinct lines of railroad—right of passengers to be carried—duty and liability of the several companies. Through tickets in the form of coupons, sold to a passenger by one railroad company, entitling him to pass over successive connecting lines of road, in the absence of an express agreement create no contract with the company selling the same, to carry him beyond the line of its own road, but they are distinct tickets for each road, sold by the first company as agent for the others, so far as the passenger is concerned.</p> <p>2. A person intending to take passage by railroad from Omaha to New York, purchased at the former place, from the Wabash, St. Louis and Pacific Railway Company, a through coupon ticket, purporting to give the right of carriage from Omaha to New York over the several lines intermediate and connecting between those two points, one of the connecting lines being the-Pennsylvania railroad. There was printed on the face of the ticket: “In selling this ticket for passage over other roads, this company acts only as agent for them, and assumes no responsibility beyond its own line.” The coupon over the Pennsylvania railroad declared, “Issued by the Wabash, St. Louis and Pacific railway, on account of the Pennsylvania railroad, ” which the company owning the latter road refused to accept, and on refusal to pay the regular fare demanded, ejected the passenger from the train: Held, in a suit by the passenger against the latter company, that the first named company contracted with the passenger only as agent of the defendant company.</p> <p>3. Where a coupon ticket has been sold calling for passage over several distinct lines of railroad, the rights of the passenger, and the duty and responsibility of the several companies over whose roads the passenger is entitled to a passage, are the same as if he had purchased a ticket at the office of each company constituting the through line.</p> <p>Í. Sam
Judges: Craig
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. McConnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee· 1897-08-19· cited 52×
- Peabody v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1891-06-24· cited 25×
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StephensSixth Circuit· 1914-12-08· cited 17×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ConnellIllinois Supreme Court· 1889-01-25· cited 13×
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. DumserIllinois Supreme Court· 1896-03-30· cited 11×
- Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. RussSeventh Circuit· 1893-10-02· cited 7×
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BrisbaneAppellate Court of Illinois· 1887-12-09· cited 5×
- Karkomi v. American Airlines, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1989-08-03· cited 4×
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. MulfordIllinois Supreme Court· 1896-05-12· cited 3×
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1887-05-27· cited 3×
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. WillardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1889-03-14· cited 3×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ConnellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1888-05-31· cited 2×
- Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LeeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1893-03-06· cited 2×
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. DumpserAppellate Court of Illinois· 1895-06-03· cited 2×
- Burn v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1910-03-18· cited 2×
- Cohen v. Cleveland, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1915-12-01· cited 2×
- Sherrod v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.E.D. Tennessee· 1979-11-11· cited 1×
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. MulfordAppellate Court of Illinois· 1895-07-05· cited 1×
- Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. DanielsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1900-07-05· cited 1×
- Peoria & Pekin Terminal Railway v. HoerrAppellate Court of Illinois· 1905-04-20· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Pennsylvania Railroad v. Connell
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.