Pennsylvania Railroad v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding as a matter of contract interpretation that “any means any”
• holding as a matter of contract interpretation that “any means any”
• granting summary judgment based on Concealment or Fraud condition in insurance policy where insured “herself informed defendant’s agent…that she had made a material misrepresentation to them….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).