Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Stineman Coal Mining Company

Citations

• 242 U.S. 298
• 37 S. Ct. 118
• 61 L. Ed. 316
• 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1503

Syllabus

<p>An action against-an interstate carrier for damages caused by unfair and discriminatory departures from a rule of car distribution in times of car shortage may be prosecuted in a state court. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. Sonman Shaft Coal Co., ante, 120.</p> <p>The rule of car distribution relied on by the plaintiff having been held discriminatory and illegal by the Interstate Commerce Commission, in due proceedings, at the complaint of other shippers, and this being proven by reports and orders of the Commission produced in evidence, held, that the administrative question, so determined, could- not be revived by the carrier to oust the jurisdiction of the court.</p> <p>By such proceedings of the Commission the Act to Regulate Commerce intends no less to redress past discriminations than prevent them in future, under the carrier’s rule, and this for the benefit of all shippers who have been or may be affected thereby; and when the Commission finds the rule obnoxious, not because of temporary or changeable conditions, but-inherently and from its adoption, and, besides ordering its discontinuance, recognizes that all injured shippers are entitled to reparation and awards it to such as appear and prove damages, the status of the rule is fixed for past as well as .future transactions under it. .</p> <p>Where a rule is found discriminatory by the Commission in the circumstances indicated in the last preceding paragraph, a shipper, though not a party before the Commission, cannot recover from the .carrier for its failures to obey the rule before the finding was made.</p>