Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Cutting

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the use of force or violence is outside the scope of First Amendment protection”
• concluding that FACE is viewpoint neutral and is neither vague nor overbroad
• concluding that FACE is viewpoint neutral and is neither vague nor overbroad
• Congress rationally concluded that violence, threats of force, and obstruction aimed at persons seeking or providing reproductive-health services affect interstate commerce
• FACE furthers several important interests, including protecting public health, safety and commerce, and protecting women and men from violence and threats in the exercise of their rights
• listing the Act’s permissible ends

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).