Skip to main content
· 4/5/1904

Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Burr

Citations

  • 130 F. 847
  • 65 C.C.A. 331
  • 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4233

Syllabus

<p>1. Shipping — Liability bob Damage to Cabgo — Contbact Giving Cabbies Benefit op Instjeance.</p> <p>A bill of lading provided that, in case of loss or injury of the goods, the damage should be adjusted on the basis of their value at the place and time of shipment, and that the carrier should have the benefit of any insurance effected by the shipper. He insured the goods for their value at the port of destination, but the policy contained a provision that in case of any agreement between the assured and any carrier whereby, in case of loss for which the carrier would be liable, he should have the benefit of the insurance, there should be no liability on the policy beyond the amount which was not recoverable from the carrier, and to make good the loss temporarily by advancing money pending delay in collecting from the carrier, which should not affect the final liability of the insurer. The goods were damaged in shipment, and the insurer advanced a sum to the owner; taking a receipt by which he agreed to prosecute his claim against the carrier, and to refund to the insurer the amount collected. Reid, that such advance was strictly within the terms of the policy, and did not constitute a payment of the loss, whereby the carrier could claim the benefit under the bill of lading as a set-off in an action by the owner to recover the damages.</p> <p>2. Same.</p> <p>Where a bill of lading limited the liability of the carrier, in case of loss or damage, to the value of the goods at the time and place of shipment, a further provision that he should have the benefit of any insurance effected by the owner is valid only as to such insurance, or so much of the insurance as represents the goods, and the value for which, in case of loss, the carrier is liable; and he cannot claim the benefit of insurance covering the increased value of the goods at the port of destination, which the owner had the right to effect for his own protection.</p>

Judges: Eacombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.