Pennsylvania-Little Creek Corp. v. Cobb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, though there was a duty to disclose, materiality was lacking because the witnesses were not critical to the trial
• finding that, though there was a duty to disclose, materiality was lacking because the witnesses were not critical to the trial
• finding that, though there was a duty to disclose, materiality was lacking because the witnesses were not critical to the trial
• finding that, though there was a duty to disclose, materiality was lacking because the witnesses were not critical to the trial
• reasoning that any “claim of prejudice is further undermined by the volume of incriminating evidence presented by the government during the remainder of the trial”
• reasoning that any “claim of prejudice is further undermined by the volume of incriminating evidence presented by the government during the remainder of the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).