Pennsylvania Indemnity Fire Corp. v. Aldridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing non-literal interpretations of intent to permanently deprive in the context of the “common-law crime of larceny”
• citing, among other cases, an out-of-jurisdiction precedent holding that “theft of goods with intent to sell them back to the owner” qualifies as larceny
• “[T]he only rule as to felonious intent in larceny to which all the cases can be reconciled, is that the intent of the taker must be to appropriate the stolen property to a use inconsistent with the property rights of the person from whom it is taken.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).