Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant is not entitled to question a juror in the hopes of proving prejudice
• “[u]nder the exception to the no impeachment rule [contained in Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 606(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).