Pennsylvania Dental Association v. Medical Service Association Of Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Specific intent to monopolize may be inferred from predatory or exclusionary conduct; necessarily, if there is no such conduct, other evidence is crucial
• “[concerted action] is dependent upon proof that participating dentists, through their majority membership on the two Blue Shield committees, actually controlled the establishment of the UCR system implemented by Blue Shield”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).