Skip to main content
· 11/18/1977

Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 32 Pa. Commw. 439
  • 379 A.2d 1062
  • 1977 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that businesses have standing to challenge unfair methods of competition only if “the nature of the competition is sufficiently alleged in the complaint.”
  • discussing whether the disputes fall within the scope of the arbitration agreement as an issue of arbitrability
  • “An organization also has standing to sue for injury to its own interests, separate from any injury to its members, inasmuch as standing may be established in an individual or representative capacity.”
  • “In determining whether the plaintiff has standing, we look solely to whether the plaintiff is the proper plaintiff in this case, without regard to the merits of the allegations in the complaint.”
  • “It is well-settled that courts must determine as a threshold matter whether they have jurisdiction to decide the issues presented. If a party is found to lack standing, the court is without subject matter jurisdiction to determine the action.” (Citations omitted.)
  • to establish the first element of an IIPEA claim \there must be a colorable economic relationship between the plaintiff and a third party with the potential to develop into a full contractual relationship\ (emphasis omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatt, Boavman, Crumlish, Rogers, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.