Skip to main content
· 5/23/1905

Penn's Ex'r v. Penn's Ex'r

Citations

  • 120 Ky. 557
  • 87 S.W. 306
  • 1905 Ky. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that boilerplate reservation of rights “does not clearly put the insured on notice of the insurer’s position.”
  • “[T]he Court does not interpret Hoover [ ] to be limited to an insurer’s duty to defend.”
  • “For the same reasons given by the Georgia Supreme Court in Hoover [ ], the Court finds that [defendant insurer] is precluded from raising a defective notice defense and [plaintiff] is entitled to partial summary judgment on the issue of notice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.