Pennoyer v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plaintiff had not established special harm where he had “not identified any economic or pecuniary losses suffered as a direct result of the [defendant’s] communications to others”
• “The Restatement (Second) of Torts requires a victim of slander per se to make some showing of general damages . . . .”
• plaintiff could have believed he would be physically restrained when security personnel told him not to move and “just stay right there” while security called the police

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).