Pennington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the admissibility of an excited utterance “is not to be measured by any precise number of minutes, hours, or days, but requires that the declarant is still under the stress and excitement caused by the traumatic occurrence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• St. Clair v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-01-29· cited 23×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-11-21· cited 22×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-03-10· cited 21×
• Huls v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1989-05-03· cited 8×
• Frazier v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-02-12· cited 7×
• Vincent N. Ludwick v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-09-22· cited 5×
• Bates v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2017-03-01· cited 4×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-05-06· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Robert McPartlin
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 271×
• Renz v. Beeman
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 148×
• Kitchen v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-11-10· cited 71×
• Rock v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-04-21· cited 24×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-10-17· cited 23×
• Tackett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1984-06-20· cited 14×