Pennington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confirming that attorneys are required to inform their clients of the maximum sentences they may face when advising them as to whether to accept or reject a plea offer
• remanding for the trial court to determine, under a correct legal framework, whether a reasonable probability existed that defendant would have accepted the plea if he had known of the correct maximum penalty he faced
• the defendant has the burden of proof at an evidentiary hearing on a rule 3.850 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ramos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-18· cited 7×
• Juan Sanchez, a/k/a George Ruiz, a/k/a Miguel Martinez v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-05· cited 5×
• Marc v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-29· cited 4×
• State of Florida v. Cedric Plummer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-06· cited 3×
• Thurston McBride v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-07· cited 2×
• Alcorn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-08· cited 1×
• Warren v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-27· cited 1×
• JEAN-BART v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-16
• Earl C. Ogden v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-13
• James Allen Black, III v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-09-24
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-01
• STATE V. JENKINS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-06-12