Pennington v. Barr Mfg. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court plainly erred in establishing a parenting plan without making the required findings, instead leav- ing the decision of father’s parenting time to a parenting coordinator
• holding that the trial court plainly erred in establishing a parenting plan without making the required findings, instead leav- ing the decision of father’s parenting time to a parenting coordinator
• holding that it was plain error for the trial court to establish a schedule of parenting time without making findings as required by ORS 107.105(1)(b) and instead leaving the matter to a parenting coordinator, and exercising discretion to correct the error
• explaining that it was appropriate to exercise our discretion “in a case in which the parties both agree that further consideration of the issue by the trial court is appropriate”
• stating that it was a “legal requirement” for the trial court to make certain findings under ORS 107.105(1) (b) and describing the court’s failure to make those required findings as an “error of law”
• “An error is ‘plain’ if it is one of law, is not reasonably in dispute, and does not require an examination of matters outside of the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).