Pennington Seed, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The vocational expert’s testimony was thus useful [in 7 determining whether claimant could perform past work], but not required.”
• “The mere existence of an impairment is insufficient proof of 11 disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).