Pennaco Energy, Inc. v. Montana Board of Environmental Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a trial court's conclusion that \because there were no corresponding federal numeric standards ... [the] adoption of numeric standards was not 'more stringent' than a federal standard\
• “Between 1972 and 2003, EC and SAR, among other parameters were regulated in Montana exclusively by narrative standards, as opposed to numeric standards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).