District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/31/2006
Penn v. State
Citations
- 941 So. 2d 466
- 2006 WL 3068361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[T]he appellant raised a facially sufficient claim that counsel was deficient because there was a legitimate basis for objecting to the sentence imposed by the trial court and the appellant received an illegal sentence as a result of this deficiency.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-24· cited 5×
- Rudolph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-26· cited 2×
- Elmore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-28· cited 2×
- Lavario Ray v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-11-04· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.