Penn v. Schtlesinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• on appeal, parties informed the court that appellants had exhausted their appeals to the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records; if so, then the exhaustion issue had been rendered moot.
• “refusal of the district judge to certify a class . . . is a matter within the discretion of the trial court”
• “The district judge acted well within his discretion when he decided that 13 additional plaintiffs would unnecessarily delay and complicate the case, and that decision is also affirmed.”
• articulating policies underlying exhaustion requirements
• applying Rule 24 intervention standards
• applying Rule 24 intervention standards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).