Penn v. Ryan's Family Steakhouses, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing panel selection and holding that the EDSI Rules do not allow for a neutral arbitration forum
• finding it unlikely that an applicant would risk her standing at an interview by questioning the application packet and appearing troublesome
• noting that the Pryner court’s concerns about employee consent are even stronger in the context of individual employees who, unlike those represented by unions, have “no representation or voice in the [ajgreement which binds them to arbitration” (emphasis in original)
• noting that the Pryner court's concerns about employee consent are even stronger in the context of individual employees who, unlike those represented by unions, have \ no representation or voice in the [a]greement which binds them to arbitration\ (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).