Penn-Texas Corp. v. Anstalt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The two-year period begins to run when the circumstances reasonably would suggest to the plaintiff that he or she may have been defrauded, so as to trigger a duty to inquire on his or her part”
• “The two-year [limitations] period begins to run when the circumstances reasonably would suggest to the plaintiff that he or she may have been defrauded, so as to trigger a duty to inquire on his or her part.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing discovery rule in the context of fraud claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).