Penn Nat. Gaming, Inc. v. Ratliff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant failed to plead sufficient facts and instructing the trial court to dismiss the plaintiff from the case
• \Conclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as factual conclusions will not suffice to defeat a motion to dismiss.\
• \Conclusory allegations or legal conclusions masquerading as factual conclusions will not suffice to defeat a motion to dismiss.\
• “[T]he corporate veil will not be pierced, in either contract or tort claims, except where there is some abuse of the corporate form itself’
• no piercing of corporate veil in absence of evidence of abuse of corporate form
• overruled on other grounds in Purdue Pharma L.P. v. State, 256 So.3d 1 (Miss. 2018) (quoting Miles v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 703 F.2d 193, 195 (5th Cir. 1983)) (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).