Skip to main content
· 12/9/1991

Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Woodscape Ltd. Partnership (In Re Woodscape Ltd. Partnership)

Citations

  • 134 B.R. 165
  • 26 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 305
  • 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1766
  • 22 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • infusion of new value is an independent act which is not a per se violation of the absolute priority rule
  • “There is no prohibition against a private sale ... and this is no requirement that the sale be by public auction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: E. Stephen Derby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.