Skip to main content
· 11/6/1978

Penix v. Califano

Citations

  • 474 F. Supp. 31
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in reaching settlement on redistricting plan, all parties “played an instrumental role” and “received a significant amount of the relief that they prayed for” and, thus, “prevailed”
  • no special circumstances render fee award “inequitable” and, further, “it would be absurd to suggest that this suit, involving important constitutional rights, is not the type of case where an award would further congressional aims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.