Skip to main content
· 7/16/1913

Peninsula Produce Exchange of Maryland v. Scott

Citations

  • 53 Pa. Super. 625
  • 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 230

Syllabus

<p>Sale— Delivery — Contract—Guarantee.</p> <p>In an action for the purchase price of fruit, where the defendant offered testimony to the effect that the fruit had been guaranteed to be delivered on a particular hour of a particular day, and that no such delivery had been made, and the testimony as to the guarantee is contradicted by the plaintiff, the case is for the jury.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.