Penick v. Dekker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that federal courts should incorporate state law when interpreting contractual agreements allocating CERC-LA liability
• holding that federal law determines the validity of a release of a federal statutory claim
• holding that the parties did intend to indemnify for CERCLA liability in an agreement made before CERCLA’s enactment
• \the burden to plead facts which would 18 give rise to equitable tolling falls upon the plaintiff\
• district court would have abused its discretion in staying discovery if the 14 discovery was relevant to whether or not the court had subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).