Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. Steinbeck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an agreement providing, “[t]his agreement, when signed by Author and Publisher, will cancel and supercede the previous agreements ...” was clearly intended to terminate an earlier agreement
• explaining that facts must be construed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party for each motion for summary judgment
• explaining that facts must be construed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party for each cross-motion for summary judgment
• explaining that facts must be construed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party for each cross-motion for summary judgment
• explaining that facts must be construed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party for each cross-motion for summary judgment
• noting that § 203 termination applies “only to grants made by the author rather than to grants made by . . . other parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).