Pendleton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that the gross method is “the simplest and fairest way”
• loss of consortium claim of claimant’s spouse is subject to employer’s subrogation interest because the only evidence of its apportionment is a self-serving letter of claimant’s counsel
• entire third-party recovery subject to subrogation where only evidence of apportionment to loss of consortium claim is letter by claimant’s counsel that $100,000 of the settlement was allocated for loss of consortium
• entire third-party recovery subject to subrogation where only evidence of apportionment to loss of consortium claim is letter by claimant's counsel that $100,000 of the settlement was allocated for loss of consortium

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).