· 7/22/1981
Pendleton v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
Citations
- 433 A.2d 1102
- 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 329
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Our purpose in reviewing elections is merely to insure that no voter was disenfranchised through improper interpretation by the Board.”
- \Our purpose in reviewing elections is merely to insure that no voter was disenfranchised through improper interpretation by the Board.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nebeker, MacK, Fer-Ren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.